• Login
Read without ads. Subscribe KOMPAS.com+

Behind the Government's IDR 14.69 Billion Endorsement: Urgency and Risks of Conflict of Interest

12 November 2026, 17:15 WIB

This article was translated by AI. Read the original article on Kompas.com. See Original

Demand for Tangible Impact on the Community

The substantial budget allocated by the government for influencer services ultimately needs to be assessed based on the impact produced.

Agustinus states that theoretically, the use of influencers in organizational communication has several objectives, including building a positive image, enhancing public trust, and making policies more understandable to the public.

However, the success of such activities is not solely measured by the quantity of content produced, the number of an influencer's followers, or the level of interaction on social media.

He insists that the success metric should be viewed from the community's perspective as the information recipients.

"If we want to assess the impact of branding from the citizens' side, it is whether the narratives, videos, or images in the content are trusted and followed by the community. If the answer is no, then the branding is merely for the ministry's interests," he explains.

In other words, the government needs to have clear indicators to measure whether the messages conveyed by influencers genuinely reach the communities targeted by the program.

Evaluations should also examine whether the public understands the information delivered, is aware of the program's benefits, and feels motivated to utilize government services being promoted.

Without such measurements, spending on influencer services risks becoming mere promotional activities whose results are difficult to substantiate.

Agustinus suggests that the government should also compare the effectiveness of using influencers with other dissemination methods, including through mass media and official ministry communication channels.

However, he cautions that effectiveness comparisons cannot solely rely on assumptions or subjective assessments.

"To answer such questions, serious research is necessary, not merely conjectures," he states.

He believes that if ministries feel their internal public relations functions have not optimally fulfilled their public communication tasks, budgets could instead be directed towards enhancing the competency of personnel.

Strengthening the human resources capacity within the ministries is part of leadership's responsibility to ensure the organization can carry out its duties.

"In my opinion, ministries need to revitalize their roles and organizational culture, rather than outsourcing or privatizing their functions to private parties," Agustinus adds.



Comment wisely and responsibly. Comments are entirely the responsibility of the commentator as regulated in the ITE Law
Report
Thank You! We have received your report. We will remove comments that conflict with the Community Guidelines and the ITE Law.
Read without ads. Subscribe KOMPAS.com+
Read without ads. Subscribe KOMPAS.com+
Read without ads. Subscribe KOMPAS.com+
Close Ads

Copyright 2008 - 2026 PT. Kompas Cyber Media (Kompas Gramedia Digital Group). All Rights Reserved.

View