• Login
Read without ads. Subscribe KOMPAS.com+

A Compromise Candidate for Vice President: Religious Leader or Practitioner?

13 November 2026, 12:34 WIB

This article was translated by AI. Read the original article on Kompas.com. See Original

In an early November 2026 warning, BMKG urged vigilance against drought, as well as forest and land fires amid a very strong El Niño, alongside the potential for heavy rains in several regions.

State affairs involve not only economic aspects but also multidimensional and interdisciplinary issues.

However, economics remains the primary focus in this discussion.

Threats of production stagnation due to declining purchasing power, rising prices of imports, and environmental disasters are interrelated issues in economic policy studies.

In addition, there are challenges in maintaining monetary stability, including exchange rates, as well as confidence in capital market trading activities. The risk of increased inflation also needs to be anticipated.

It is possible for the President to choose a practitioner specializing in economics as one of the vice presidential candidates.

Thus, the choice between a religious leader or a practitioner stems from two equally pressing needs: fostering social trust and strengthening the government's ability to resolve public issues.

Both can serve as a middle ground when filling the vice president position risks inciting new competition among the government's supporting factions.

For the President, proposing a figure with cross-group acceptance can diminish the perception that one party gains excessive power.

Supporting parties also have reasons to accept the figure without feeling they are handing a strategic position to a competitor.

The room for compromise opens up as the focus is on governance needs.

Nonetheless, broad acceptance must be supported by a solid track record.

A religious leader warrants consideration for their ability to nurture intergroup relationships, uphold moral authority, and advocate for collective interests.

Proximity to a single organization does not preclude possibility.

What matters is whether they have been able to transcend organizational boundaries when dealing with national issues.



Comment wisely and responsibly. Comments are entirely the responsibility of the commentator as regulated in the ITE Law
Report
Thank You! We have received your report. We will remove comments that conflict with the Community Guidelines and the ITE Law.
Read without ads. Subscribe KOMPAS.com+
Read without ads. Subscribe KOMPAS.com+
Read without ads. Subscribe KOMPAS.com+
Close Ads

Copyright 2008 - 2026 PT. Kompas Cyber Media (Kompas Gramedia Digital Group). All Rights Reserved.

View