Indonesian Police Affirms No Lifetime Driver's License Policy, Valid for 5 Years
-
News
-
3 minutes ago
This article was translated by AI. Read the original article on Kompas.com. See Original
JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - The name "Gibran" suddenly surfaced during a meeting discussing the List of Issues (Daftar Inventarisasi Masalah - DIM) of the Draft Law on Agrarian Reform Regulation between the DPR's Legislative Body (Baleg) and the government on Friday (18/9/2026).
The name Gibran was mentioned by Baleg member Ahmad Irawan while the DPR and government debated whether or not to include the National Agrarian Reform Agency (BRAN) by name in the bill.
"If this is merely a naming issue, this is BRAN. Is it BRAN or Gibran, sir?" Irawan said during the meeting.
Irawan made the remark after explaining that the DPR and government have agreed on the duties, functions, and authorities of the institution that will handle agrarian reform.
According to him, the issue at hand is not simply the agency's name but also its institutional effectiveness since the institution will have to coordinate with ministries that hold authority over land and agrarian matters.
"In my opinion, if it's truly just a naming matter and not something significant related to duties, functions, authorities, and the placement of this institution under the President's responsibility, then I think it's something the leadership can discuss. It's not a major issue that we need to debate at length. We better proceed to other matters," Irawan said.
Golkar Faction DPR Commission II Member Ahmad IrawanThe debate over the BRAN name began when Deputy Chair of Baleg, Sturman Panjaitan, questioned the provision stating that the determination of agrarian reform objects is made based on decisions from government agencies.
Sturman expressed surprise and confusion as to why BRAN was not explicitly named in the provision.
The Chair of the Working Committee on the Agrarian Reform Regulation Bill, Iman Sukri, explained that the agency's name was not included because its formation would be regulated later by the government through a Presidential Regulation (Perpres).
Sturman then questioned why the DPR must wait for a Perpres to determine an agency created by law.
"We are making a law, why wait for a presidential regulation? That's strange. We make the law, and regulations like presidential regulations or government regulations follow. Why are we waiting on a Perpres? I find it strange and rather absurd," Sturman said.
Responding to this, Deputy Minister of State Secretariat Bambang Eko Suhariyanto explained that the government wants to give the President the freedom to decide the agency's nomenclature.
"Sir, if I may be frank, this article originally reflected the President's wishes, sir. So he wants the flexibility to name the agency or whatever it is, not to prohibit it. Essentially, the law shouldn't fix the agency's name," Bambang said.
According to Bambang, this provision was made to avoid locking the agency's name in law.
He added that the government had previously sent letters via the Ministry of State Secretariat to relevant institutions regarding agency nomenclature in law discussions.